![]() The judge, who eventually sentenced him to prison, even mentioned the importance of his decision towards the danger of future cases related to trade secrets theft whereas a non-custodial sentence would implicate “a green light to every future brilliant engineer to steal trade secrets” (BBC, 2020). Taken from Forbesĭespite this, prosecutors continued to hunt down Levandowski. Photo: Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick (left) and Ex-Google Engineer Anthony Levandowski (right). The dispute ended in 2018 in favor of Google by having Uber transfer a 0.34% equity stake which amounted to a whopping USD 245 million payment at the time of the reports (Bhuiyan, 2018). This included the purchase of assets relevant to self-driving technology from his independently owned hardware firms (Duhigg, 2018). The project invested millions into research through the direction of Levandowski. Levandowski was the former head of Google’s self-driving technology experiment, Project Chauffeur, presently known as Waymo. Ultimately, Google claimed that Uber allegedly stole trade secrets from them (Wakabayashi and Isaac, 2017) by conspiring the acquisition of Otto, a self-driving truck startup, with its owner and ex-google engineer, Anthony Levandowski. That said, the type of IP argued in this case is Trade Secrets, a form of IP rights classified as confidential information that legally binds authorized persons to secrecy. This fiasco is deeply rooted in the concept of intellectual property (IP) that, to put it simply, determines ownership rights over the property. Tesla’s lawsuit against Cao came just a day after it filed a similar lawsuit against Silicon Valley startup Zoox and four former employees who worked in its warehouse and distribution center.The infamous dispute between Google and Uber for its self-driving technology is among the long line of events that contribute to the historical memories of residents in Silicon Valley, technology enthusiasts, and more turbulently, technology-based company employees. sued two of its former employees who left to join Xpeng, also accusing them of taking confidential information related to Apple’s driverless technology to their new employer. The lawsuit marks at least the third similar accusation by a major Western company against Xpeng. Tesla said this would not be the first time that a new Xpeng recruit tried to bring his or her former employer’s trade secrets to Xpeng, according to the lawsuit. Xpeng founder He Xiaopeng said on his personal social media account that his company has been developing its self-driving technology independently. The Chinese carmaker said it had started an internal investigation to look into the matter. Xpeng said it has not found that any of Cao’s behavior has breached its regulations, either before or after he joined the company, according to a statement issued by the company on Friday. Tesla did not list Xpeng as a defendant in the lawsuit, but alleged the Chinese startup had “reportedly designed its vehicles around Tesla’s open-source patents and has transparently imitated Tesla’s design, technology and even its business model.” The Silicon Valley tech giant further alleged that Xpeng introduced “Autopilot-like” features and now employs at least five of Tesla’s former Autopilot employees, including Cao. ![]() 4, his last day at Tesla, Cao had cleared all his browser history, according to the complaint. 26, two weeks after receiving a written employment offer from the Chinese startup. He allegedly deleted more than 120,000 files that month and disconnected his iCloud account from his Tesla-issued computer on Dec. ![]() It said it learned that Cao had begun searching for a new job by November, and received an offer from Xpeng in December. Tesla alleged that Cao began uploading complete copies of Autopilot-related source code, totaling more than 300,000 files and directories, to his personal iCloud account long before he left the company on Jan. Tesla filed the lawsuit a day after suing four other employees and a company over similar allegations, highlighting the importance it places on key proprietary technologies like those used for self-driving cars. The defendant, Guangzhi Cao, worked for the tech giant in Silicon Valley for its “elite” Autopilot team before returning to China to work for Xpeng Motors, according to the lawsuit filed on Thursday in California. has sued a former engineer who left the company to join a rival Chinese startup, accusing him of stealing trade secrets, including source code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |